NEA Removes Anti-Trans Grant Requirement Following Backlash
# NEA Drops Controversial “Gender Ideology” Compliance Requirement Following ACLU Lawsuit
The **National Endowment for the Arts (NEA)** has announced that it will remove its requirement prohibiting applicants from using federal funds “to promote gender ideology,” following legal action from the **American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)**. This decision marks a significant shift after the ACLU challenged the stipulation in a **Rhode Island federal court** last week, claiming that it was unconstitutional and violated **First Amendment rights**.
However, despite the removal of the requirement, projects perceived to align with “gender ideology” remain at risk of being denied funding under a broader interpretation of former **President Donald Trump’s executive order**. The case has sparked a heated debate about government funding, LGBTQ+ rights, and artistic freedom.
## **Understanding the NEA’s Decision**
### **Background of the Requirement**
The NEA, the **largest public funder of the arts in the United States**, quietly updated its **Legal Requirements and Assurance of Compliance webpage** last month. This update came in response to Trump’s **anti-trans executive order**, which limits the federal government’s recognition of gender to biological sex and excludes projects purportedly promoting “gender ideology.”
Critics, including the **ACLU**, have argued that the term is **“unconstitutionally vague”**, making it unclear which works of art or projects could be excluded. The National Queer Theater, Rhode Island Latino Arts (RILA), and other organizations joined the lawsuit after fearing their projects supporting trans and nonbinary artists would be denied critical federal funding.
### **The Legal Challenge by the ACLU**
In its complaint, the **ACLU** argued that the NEA’s requirement imposed **a viewpoint-based restriction**, barring artists from expressing perspectives that affirm the experiences of **trans and nonbinary individuals**. Lead attorney **Vera Eidelman** said the stipulation created a **dangerous precedent** that undermined free expression in the arts.
> “It’s basically a ban on anyone getting NEA funds because they express a message that the government doesn’t like, and that is very much contrary to what the First Amendment allows,” — **Vera Eidelman, ACLU Senior Staff Attorney**
The lawsuit prompted swift action, leading the NEA to **voluntarily** drop the gender ideology clause **without a court order**. However, the agency has **not clarified whether projects deemed to align with “gender ideology” will still face barriers to funding**.
## **What Happens Next?**
### **Implications for Artists and Arts Organizations**
– The **removal** of the gender ideology stipulation is a **major victory for artistic freedom**, but uncertainty remains about how the **Trump-era policies** will be enforced.
– Many arts groups, including **Theatre Communications Group and The Theater Offensive**, have long relied on NEA funding to support creators whose work explores themes of **identity, expression, and inclusion**.
### **Upcoming Legal Hearings**
A federal court hearing is scheduled for **March 18**, where the ACLU is expected to **seek an injunction** preventing the NEA from enforcing funding bans related to expressions of gender identity. The timing is critical, as applications for the **NEA’s Grants for Arts Projects close on March 24**.
## **Broader Context: A War on Diversity in Federal Arts Funding?**
The NEA’s decision follows a separate issue regarding its **anti-DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) compliance requirement**, which was **overturned by a federal judge last month**. The swift removal of DEI funding restrictions suggests a broader **uncertainty in how federal grants will be administered under shifting political pressures**.
Organizations advocating for LGBTQ+ artists see the latest development as a step forward but remain cautious.
> “We won’t stop fighting until these new requirements are struck down for good.” – **Vera Eidelman, ACLU Press Release**
## **Conclusion**
The NEA’s voluntary decision to drop the gender ideology clause marks a **partial win for advocates of free artistic expression**, but the underlying issue remains unresolved. With an upcoming court battle and the ambiguity over how projects will be judged, **LGBTQ+ and artistic communities must remain vigilant** in ensuring federal funds support inclusive and diverse creative works.
—
### **How You Can Help**
If you believe in protecting artistic freedom, consider supporting independent journalism that covers these critical legal battles. Organizations like **Hyperallergic**, which reported extensively on this case, rely on readers like you to continue their work.
🔹 [**Join as a member**](https://hyperallergic.com/membership?utm_source=newspack&utm_medium=website&utm_campaign=mil1) to support factual, independent reporting.