{"id":556508,"date":"2026-05-08T16:07:49","date_gmt":"2026-05-08T16:07:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/winklersart.com\/?p=556508"},"modified":"2026-05-08T16:07:49","modified_gmt":"2026-05-08T16:07:49","slug":"this-officer-from-the-franklin-expedition-perished-in-the-arctic-wearing-a-uniform-that-was-not-his-own-now-dna-has-uncovered-his-true-identity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/winklersart.com\/?p=556508","title":{"rendered":"This officer from the Franklin Expedition perished in the Arctic wearing a uniform that was not his own. Now, DNA has uncovered his true identity."},"content":{"rendered":"

Recent studies have uncovered four participants from the ill-fated 1845 expedition searching for the Northwest Passage, among them the owner of a wallet filled with papers that has perplexed historians for years<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n \"Meilan\n <\/div>\n
\n

\n

Meilan Solly<\/p>\n

| Senior Associate Digital Editor, History<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\"A\n <\/picture>
\n

A 19th-century illustration of HMS\u00a0Erebus<\/em>, one of the two vessels involved in John Franklin’s 1845 Arctic expedition
\n Public domain via Wikimedia Commons<\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In 1859, a recovery group searching for evidence of the lost Franklin expedition to the Arctic came across the skeleton of a man described as \u201cslight of build, and possibly taller than average.\u201d<\/p>\n

In proximity, they discovered a clothes brush, a comb, and a wallet that held multiple documents, including a seaman\u2019s certificate for Henry Peglar, the captain of the foretop on HMS Terror, one of the two ships involved in the tragic expedition. Interestingly, the man\u2019s attire seemed more in line with that of a Royal Navy steward or an officer’s servant\u2014positions much lower than Peglar\u2019s rank. Complicating the situation further, the papers found in the wallet were inscribed backward, rendering their significance largely a mystery to this day.<\/p>\n

Historians have debated that the skeleton may belong to a sailor of inferior rank to Peglar, possibly a companion who was left with his belongings after his demise. However, a new DNA study published in the journal Polar Record<\/em> confirms that the remains unearthed on King William Island are indeed Peglar\u2019s.<\/p>\n

\n

\"A

\n

A page discovered in the wallet close to Henry Peglar’s skeleton<\/p>\n

\u00a9 National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London, under CC-BY-NC-ND<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

British explorer and Rear Admiral <\/strong>John Franklin embarked with two vessels, Terror<\/em> and HMS Erebus<\/em>, on a mission to find the Northwest Passage in May 1845, only to mysteriously disappear in the Arctic Archipelago. The 129 crew members were equipped with provisions intended to last three years in the harsh climate, or longer if rationed, yet none survived. Documentary evidence regarding the expedition\u2019s fate is primarily limited to the Victory Point Note, a piece of paper found in a mound on King William Island in 1859, but Indigenous testimony and archaeological findings have also assisted historians in unraveling the probable sequence of events.<\/p>\n

These sources indicate that the crew spent their initial winter on Beechey Island, now part of Nunavut, Canada, with three men perishing between January and April 1846. The Victory Point Note, which features two handwritten messages penned in the margins of a preprinted document, states that Franklin himself passed away in June 1847.<\/p>\n

By April 1848, the expedition’s fatalities escalated to 9 officers and 15 crew members. \u201cHad a rescue occurred at this juncture, the expedition would still have held the unfortunate distinction of having the highest death rate in the annals of British Arctic exploration,\u201d historian David C. Woodman recounted in *Unraveling the Franklin Mystery: Inuit Testimony*. The remaining 105 members would soon meet a similar end.<\/p>\n

\n

\"The

\n

A map depicting the approximate route of the Franklin expedition, alongside the wreck sites of HMS Erebus<\/em> and HMS Terror<\/em> \/ Illustration by Meilan Solly
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

When the recovery group encountered the lone skeleton 11 years later, they theorized that the sailor may have chosen to traverse a ridge to conserve energy, only to collapse \u201cface down in the position we found him,\u201d succumbing to exhaustion and exposure.<\/p>\n

Due to the discrepancy between the clothing of the skeleton and Peglar\u2019s rank, experts initially proposed that the remains belonged to gunroom steward Thomas Armitage, who had served alongside Peglar in a prior expedition. As Woodman noted, \u201cThe captain of the foretop would never have been found, even in death, wearing a steward\u2019s bow-knot.\u201d The freshly revealed identification provides a surprising resolution to this longstanding enigma.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere are many pieces to that puzzle, but finally, about 166 years later, we have put that one to rest,\u201d lead author Douglas Stenton, an archaeologist at the University of Waterloo in Canada, informs the Canadian Press’ Jordan Omstead. In a blog entry, Russell A. Potter, author of *Finding Franklin: The Untold Story of a 165-Year Search*, speculates, \u201cPerhaps, since [Peglar] was near at least one if not two stewards, he intentionally donned the coat of his deceased shipmate.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n

\"A

\n

A forensic reconstruction of the face of David Young, boy first class on HMS\u00a0Erebus<\/em><\/p>\n

Diana Trepkov<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Peglar is now the sixth individual from the Franklin expedition whose remains have been confirmed through DNA. The authors of the Polar Record<\/em> article also announced three other identifications in a different study released in the *Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports* earlier this week. Located approximately 80 miles from Peglar\u2019s skeleton, the remains of William Orren, David Young, and John Bridgens have been identified, all crew members from Terror<\/em>\u2019s sister ship, HMS Erebus<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Stenton and his team began examining skeletons linked to the Franklin expedition in 2013, extracting DNA from the bones with the intention of comparing the profiles with samples from the descendants of the men.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe were uncertain what findings we would uncover,\u201d Stenton tells the Globe and Mail\u2019s Ivan Semeniuk. \u201cWe believed determining where some of these men perished might illuminate events that unfolded during the expedition.\u201d<\/p>\n

Conventional narratives of the expedition suggested that the men undertook an overland trek southward, dragging heavy sleds filled with supplies, hoping to find rescue, only to fall one by one along the journey.<\/p>\n

However, more recent investigations challenge this narrative. As Woodman mentioned to Smithsonian<\/em> magazine in 2025, \u201cThere is ample evidence, including in my book and others, that contradicts the notion that could not possibly be accurate.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Did you know: John Rae\u2019s 1854 findings<\/p>\n

    \n
  • The initial significant evidence regarding the fate of the Franklin expedition surfaced in 1854, when Scottish explorer\u00a0John Rae\u00a0published a\u00a0report\u00a0 based on discussions with Inuit individuals living in the Arctic Archipelago, alongside\u00a0retrieved artifacts.<\/li>\n
  • Rae reported that \u201csome, if not all, survivors from the regrettable party led by Sir John Franklin met with an end as sorrowful and horrific as one could imagine\u201d\u2014a veiled reference to cannibalism.<\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    Drawing from Inuit oral traditions and the positions of the shipwrecks of Erebus<\/em> and Terror<\/em>\u2014discovered in 2014 and 2016, respectively\u2014Woodman theorizes that the abandonment referred to in the Victory Point Note was temporary, with the survivors returning to the vessels and manning at least one to sail further south. He suggests that thereafter, they broke into groups, each taking a different approach in their struggle for survival.<\/p>\n

    The precise events of the men\u2019s final days remain elusive, but it is likely that starvation, exposure, fatigue, scurvy, and various illnesses played a role in the expedition\u2019s unprecedented mortality rate. Marks noted on some sailors\u2019 bones corroborate Inuit accounts that describe acts of cannibalism.<\/p>\n

    In 2024, Stenton and two co-authors of the recent studies, anthropologist Robert W. Park and technician Stephen Fratpietro, released a paper identifying a jawbone marked with cutting traces as belonging to James Fitzjames, captain of Erebus<\/em> and one of the expedition\u2019s highest-ranking officials. The evidence of Fitzjames\u2019 remains showing signs of cannibalism illustrates that \u201cneither rank nor status was the guiding principle in the final desperate hours of the expedition as [the men] attempted to save themselves,\u201d Stenton remarked at that time. (No signs of cannibalism were seen in the recently identified remains.)<\/p>\n

    \n

    \"James

    \n

    James Fitzjames, captain of HMS\u00a0Erebus<\/em><\/p>\n

    Public domain via Wikimedia Commons<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    A plethora of Fitzjames\u2019 correspondence home, penned just before the expedition, remains today, shedding light on his character. In contrast, Potter notes that \u201ccomparatively few letters\u201d exist from the four newly recognized crew members. \u201cIt\u2019s possible fewer were ever written, and those that were are less likely to have been preserved and saved,\u201d he writes on his blog. \u201cYet, the evidence of a bone, unlike a letter, is undeniable: Here lay a man, and these are his remains.\u201d<\/p>\n

    In a statement, Park emphasizes Peglar\u2019s identification as particularly significant, stating, \u201cIt was fascinating to definitively identify this sailor since the body was discovered with nearly the only written documents from the expedition ever recovered.\u201d While the so-called Peglar Papers are among the few records of their kind, they do not illuminate much about their \u201cunfortunate owner and the disastrous journey of the lost crews,\u201d as the searchers who retrieved the pages had hoped. Rather, the scant sections that can be read seem to focus on the author\u2019s recollections of more temperate climates.<\/p>\n

    \u201cAt times he appears to reference the present, but most of it is recollections of warmer locations,\u201d Potter told Smithsonian<\/em> in 2025. \u201cIt\u2019s the sort of content one would pen while shivering.\u201d<\/p>\n