“Examining 2024 Urban Artwork: Nekst, Guess, and the Discussion on Morality in City Creativity”

**Examining 2024 Street Art: Nekst, Guess, and the Discussion on Ethics in Urban Creativity**

Street art, historically a domain of defiance, self-identity, and cultural critique, continues to transform in 2024, influencing the visual and conceptual landscape of city environments. This year’s artistic scene is particularly vibrant, driven by legendary figures such as the late Nekst, modern innovators like Guess, and fervent discussions regarding the ethics of urban artistry. Let’s explore how these elements intertwine, what they uncover about society, and how they question our perceptions of contemporary cities.

—

### Nekst: A Legacy That Endures
The name “Nekst” continues to resonate strongly within the realm of street art, even more than a decade after the notorious graffiti artist’s premature departure in 2012. Celebrated for his striking typographic designs, Nekst became emblematic of grandeur and resilience within the graffiti community. His creations, whether vast block-letter throw-ups on industrial rooftops or train backdrops, exhibited a daring and impulsive spirit that defined the raw essence of the art form.

In 2024, the impact of Nekst remains palpable. Artists persist in emulating his scale and bravery while honoring his audacity in confronting legal and societal obstacles. His influences are evident in the works of his successors and peers, such as Revok and members of the MSK crew, who continue to extend his legacy by challenging the limits of graffiti’s established norms. More crucially, Nekst’s legacy provokes compelling inquiries about permanence in a form that is intrinsically transient. Is it possible for an artist to attain everlasting recognition through underground murals and ephemeral public artworks? In many respects, the ongoing allusions to Nekst affirm that street art transcends mere vandalism—it represents a continuous cultural discourse.

—

### Guess: The Collaborative Horizon of Graffiti
While Nekst encapsulates the unrefined and rebellious essence of graffiti’s history, figures like the intriguing Guess embody a more collaborative and contemporary perspective on street art in 2024. Fusing styles such as wheatpaste art, expansive murals, and digital projections, Guess has emerged as a spokesperson for hybrid artists merging unauthorized street works with commissioned projects.

Guess’s creations often intertwine symbols, text, and vibrant color schemes, delving into societal challenges like gentrification, environmental degradation, and digital disconnect. In contrast to purists who view commissioned pieces as a compromise, Guess welcomes partnerships with brands and communities to finance expansive undertakings while preserving an edge in unsanctioned urban art. For instance, last year’s “Digital Shadows” series—a fusion of augmented reality and traditional murals adorning abandoned structures—ignited intense discussions about the significance of street art in a technology-driven era.

The emergence of artists like Guess highlights how street art is transitioning from a mere countercultural movement on the margins to a significant—and at times contentious—component of urban aesthetics, often sponsored by municipalities and corporations eager to revitalize neighborhoods or boost tourism.

—

### The Ethical Dilemma: Art vs. Vandalism
As street art continues to progress, so does the ongoing conversation regarding its legitimacy and ethical ramifications. Critics assert that unauthorized graffiti equates to vandalism that disrespects public and private properties, frequently leading to substantial cleanup expenses for city budgets. Conversely, advocates argue that street art democratizes artistic expression, transforming dull, neglected areas into colorful visual stories and offering a powerful platform for underrepresented voices.

In 2024, this discussion has evolved. The increased corporate involvement in street art—where tech entrepreneurs and fashion labels commission artworks under the pretense of cultural engagement—has triggered backlash. Opponents contend that this appropriation undermines the raw authenticity of street art, reducing it to another element of the capitalist framework. On the other hand, advocates claim that these collaborations act as essential support systems for artists whose livelihoods were previously hampered by illegality and funding limitations.

This conversation closely relates to a broader ethical question: *Who possesses urban environments?* Cities inherently belong to all, yet the governing bodies impose restrictions intended to maintain order. Graffiti creators frequently uphold that the unregulated utilization of city surfaces and infrastructure is a way to reclaim public territories for collective expression. In contrast, property owners and regulatory entities view unauthorized street art as an intrusion that diminishes property values and infringes on their rights.

—

### The Preservation Paradox: Should Street Art Be Saved?
Interestingly, much of the contemporary dialogue surrounding street art centers on its transitory nature. While its fleeting character enhances its cultural significance, 2024 has witnessed an increasing movement advocating for street art preservation. Renowned works by Banksy, Shepard Fairey, and even newer figures like Guess have been removed from walls, encased in glass, or digitally documented—a trend that some argue strips the art of its ephemeral allure.

The conflict between